Note [original edition] : The Jews
say, Ezra
is the son of God;] This grievous charge against the
Jews the commentators endeavour to
support by telling us that it is meant of some ancient heterodox
Jews, or else
of some
Jews of
Medina; who said so for no other reason than for that the law
being utterly lost and forgotten during the
Babylonish captivity,
Ezra, having
been raised to life after he had been dead one hundred years
3,
dictated the
whole anew to the scribes, out of his own memory; at which they greatly
marvelled, and declared that he could not have done it unless he were the son
of
God
4.
Al Beidâwi, adds that the imputation must be true, because this
verse was read to the
Jews, and they did not contradict it; which they were
ready enough to do in other instances.
That
Ezra did thus restore not only the
Pentateuch, but also the other
books of the
Old Testament, by divine revelation, was the opinion of several
of the
Christian fathers, who are quoted by Dr.
Prideaux
5,
and of some other
writers
6;
which they seem to have first borrowed from a passage in that very
ancient apocryphal book, called (in our
English Bible) the
second book of
Esdras
7.
Dr.
Prideaux
8
tells us that herein the fathers attributed more to
Ezra than the
Jews themselves, who suppose that he only collected and set
forth a correct edition of the scriptures, which he laboured much in, and went
a great way in the perfecting of it. It is not improbable, however, that the
fiction came originally from the
Jews, tho’ they be now of another opinion,
and I cannot fix it upon them by any direct proof. For, not to insist on the
testimony of the
Mohammedans (which yet I cannot but think of some little
weight in a point of this nature), it is allowed by the most sagacious critics
that the second book of
Ezra was written by a
Christian indeed
9,
but yet one
who had been bred a
Jew, and was intimately acquainted with the fables of the
Rabbins
10;
and the story itself is perfectly in the taste and way of thinking
of those men.
-
3
See chap. 3. p. 31.
-
4
Al Beidawi, Al Zamakhshari, &c.
-
5
Connect. part. 1. l. 5. p. 329.
-
6
Chap. xiv. 20, &c.
-
7
Athanasius junior, in Synopsi S. Script. T. 2. p. 86. Leontius
Byzantin. de Sectis. p. 428.
-
8
Loco citat.
-
9
See 2 Esdras 2. 45-47; and vii. 28, &c.
-
10
V. Dodwelli Dissert. Cyprian. Dissert. 4, § 2. Whiston’s Essay on the
Apostolical Constit. p. 34, 76, and 304, &c.; et Fabricii Codic. Apocryph.
Novi Test. part 2. p. 936, &c.